|EQI.org Home | Business
Affect of Emotional Intelligence on a Modern
By Samuel E.
Note: The paper below came to EQI with this note:
Thanks, Sam, for offering to share your paper with my visitors. -- Steve
Other EQI.org Topics:
Emotional Intelligence | Empathy
Search EQI.org | Support EQI.org
|Note - I have not carefully critiqued this paper,
so I am not implying that I agree with all that Sam says
in it. For example, Sam uses Goleman's model of EI,
which of course I don't agree with. S. Hein
By Samuel E. Bliss
Effective management of organizations and human resources is facing enormous challenges. Organizations are downsizing, reengineering themselves to compete in the global market and facing an explosion of available information (Luthans, 1998). Max Messmer (1999), CEO of Robert Half, said in a recent survey of 150 executives from some of the nations largest companies, that leadership skills were identified as the most important assets of managers. James E. Perrella (1999), Chairman, President and CEO, Ingersoll-Rand Company, stated
These two examples indicate the growing importance of finding, hiring, training, and retaining leaders with high emotional intelligence.
Emotional intelligence is defined as a persons self-awareness, self-confidence, self-control, commitment and integrity, and a persons ability to communicate, influence, initiate change and accept change (Goleman, 1998). Studies have shown that emotional intelligence impacts a leaders ability to be effective (Goleman, 1998). Three of the most important aspects of emotional intelligence for a leaders ability to make effective decisions are self-awareness, communication and influence, and commitment and integrity. Managers who do not develop their emotional intelligence have difficulty in building good relationships with peers, subordinates, superiors and clients (Goleman, 1998).
The following paper is an examination of how emotional intelligence affects a leaders ability to make effective decisions. The first part of the essay defines the parameters of emotional intelligence, leadership and effective decision-making. This is followed by a discussion of how the aspects of emotional intelligence affect a leaders ability to make good decisions and how emotional intelligence is integral to Stephen Coveys seven habits of highly successful people and Warren Bennis beliefs on what leadership is. The last section of the paper concludes with the leadership responsibilities that are implemented through the use of emotional intelligence.
Definition and Motive
"When it comes to improving organizational effectiveness, management scholars and practitioners are beginning to emphasize the importance of a managers emotional intelligence" (Sosik, Megerian, 1999, p. 367). What influence does emotional intelligence have on the effectiveness of decisions made by a modern organizational leader? To answer this question, three concepts need to be defined: emotional intelligence, qualities of a leader, and effective decision-making.
Emotional intelligence is a combination of competencies. These skills contribute to a persons ability to manage and monitor his or her own emotions, to correctly gauge the emotional state of others and to influence opinions (Caudron, 1999; Goleman, 1998). Goleman describes a model of five dimensions. Each area has its own set of behavioral attributes as follows.
These five characteristics will be shown to apply to a leaders ability to make effective decisions. Next, the qualities of a leader are defined.
What makes a person a leader is still debated, but according to Warren Bennis (1994) all leaders seem to share some common traits. The first is a guiding vision or purpose. A leader has a clear idea of what she or he wants to do professionally and personally, and will pursue the goal regardless of the setbacks. The second characteristic is passion or enthusiasm and the ability to communicate that passion to others. Third, is integrity, consisting of three ingredients: self-knowledge, candor, and maturity. Self-knowledge is knowing ones strengths and weaknesses. Candor is being honest with yourself and is the key to knowing yourself. Maturity is the result of the lessons learned through following, while observing others, learning to be dedicated, and working with others. It is being truthful and never servile. The last two traits go hand in hand: curiosity and daring. A leader wants to learn as much as possible and is willing to take risks.
The term effective in this essay can be defined as (1) "getting the job done through high quantity and quality standards of performance, and (2) getting the job done through people, requiring their satisfaction and commitment" (Luthans, 1998, p 427). In short, Bennis is describing transformational leadership qualities (Luthans, 1998).
|1. Guiding vision
2. Passion & commuication ability
3. Integrity - self-knowledge, candor, "maturity"
Maturity defined as lessons learned,
What then is the link between emotional intelligence and effective leaders? A Pennsylvania State University study done by John J. Sosik and Lara E. Megerian (1999) looked at the self-awareness component of emotional intelligence and transformational leadership. The results of the study provided empirical support for emotional intelligence being the foundation of other aspects of leadership. The data for the study were collected from 63 managers, 192 subordinates, and 63 management superiors. Managers reported their assessment of their emotional intelligence and leadership behavior; the subordinates reported their view of their managers transformational leadership behavior and performance outcomes; and each managers superior rated managerial performance. The study tried to answer two questions. The first question tried to find "what aspects of [emotional intelligence] differentiate those leaders who are in agreement with others concerning their transformational leadership qualities from those who are not in agreement" (p. 368). The second question asked "how do non-military leaders who are in agreement with others regarding their transformational leadership qualities differ in terms of performance from those who are not in agreement" (p. 368).
Leaders who underestimated their leadership were positively linked to social self-confidence while leaders who overestimated their abilities were negatively related to sensitivity. The results also suggested "self-awareness may provide individuals with greater perceived control over interpersonal events and consequences in their life transformational leaders who are self-aware possess high levels of self-confidence and self-efficacy and provide orientation for followers" (p. 384). The authors suggest that self-awareness may enable leaders to understand the emotional implications of their own feelings and thoughts. For example, before a manager uses a 360-degree feedback assessment, they must "understand what depositional attributes and leadership behaviors are associated with managerial effectiveness" (p. 386). Managers who maintain accurate self-awareness have more attributes of emotional intelligence and appear to be more effective to their superiors and subordinates. Interviews of three senior executives revealed that "managers who played the game according to established norms were looked upon favorably by superiors in performance evaluations and promotion considerations. However, those interviews also revealed that fast-track candidates and the darlings of senior management are often seen as self-serving, duplicitous and uncaring by their subordinates" (p. 386). The high public self-consciousness aspect of emotional intelligence may be useful for managers who are interested in success (to maximize performance appraisal ratings), but "this does not guarantee high ratings of transformational leadership and effectiveness by ones subordinates" (p. 386).
A Leader With Emotional Intelligence
These findings are consistent with Patricia Pitchers (1999) description of a company led by one CEO with high emotional intelligence who was succeeded by a CEO without emotional intelligence. She began with a description of the high emotional intelligence CEO (the artist) who took over a medium-sized company. He had a vision to build the company into a global corporation "operating in general and life insurance, banking, trust and investments services" (p. 32) spanning the world. This dream of his was during the time when most people believed banking and insurance would never meet. After 15 years, the company was worth $20 billion dollars and was an integrated service company in Europe, Asia and North America. The CEOs colleagues described him as a warm, generous, people-oriented, imaginative, daring and funny person.
Patricia Pitcher explains the generous, people-oriented attributes helped him attract and keep great colleagues and investors. His emotional and inspiring traits allowed his enthusiasm to spread. The visionary, daring, intuitive and unpredictable qualities helped him to keep focused on the goal, avoid short-term gratifications and achieve his goal. His open-mindedness helped the company and himself to develop and retain different kinds of people. This ensured new ideas and fresh approaches to problem solving. The CEO surrounded himself with the best talent he could find. He decentralized the power structure allowing his talented staff to express themselves in their own way. He sat on the independent boards and asked questions, but did not interfere with his staff. The other executives included artists and six craftsmen.
The craftsmen were described as being well-balanced, trustworthy, reasonable, sensible and realistic. They were complementary to the artists. These craftsmen knew what worked and what did not. They understood that people made mistakes, but they learned from them, and if you drove out error, you drove out innovation. These people dealt with the day-to-day operations.
There were six other people in the company whom Pitcher calls the technocrats. These people were described as being "intense, determined, uncompromising, hardheaded, cerebral and analytical." They were often called "brilliant, stiff and distant." (p. 32) Their interpersonal relationships lacked depth, and they misread the people around them. She described the technocrats as people who thought they were "realistic and sensible, even imaginative, but no one else did" (p. 32). Technocrats erred in their judgments of others, markets and situations. They did not learn from the mistakes because they thought others were at fault. Those who made errors would be fired. The article goes on to describe what happened when the CEO felt it was time for him to leave and let fresh air into the company.
A Leader Without Emotional Intelligence
In 1980 the company leadership was given to the second-in-command, a technocrat. This leader was analytical, uncompromising and brilliant. Patricia Pitcher believes such a person would find decentralization a sloppy way of doing business. So, the new CEO started to centralize the decision-making processes. He created a new head office that replaced the subsidiaries authority. All of the craftsmen and artists running the subsidiaries were gradually fired and replaced by competent professionals or technocrats by 1992. Within three years the "organization was dead." If the professionals where so brilliant, what caused the company to fail?
Pitcher suggests that the company failed because "If you [do not have] respect for the emotional qualities that come in the imaginative package, you drive out the peculiar vision of an Artist. If you equate experienced with outmoded or old-fashioned, you drive out the Craftsman, who inspires the loyalty and the dedication, and who knows what making widgets is all about. If you fire people for making one mistake, nobodys going to go out on a limb to make any. Innovation stops. An organization without loyalty, dedication, skill, and dreams can go downhill very fast" (p. 33). She points out that running a modern company requires "all kinds of perspectives even the cerebral, analytical and uncompromising. The Artists and Craftsmen can live with those different perspectives, but the Technocrat cannot" (p. 33). What does this perspective reveal about the relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership effectiveness?
To answer the question, an examination of the influence of emotional intelligence on the two leaders is required. The first chief executive officer demonstrated most of the attributes associated with emotional intelligence. Accurate self-assessment (self-awareness) was demonstrated by his ability to know his limits and his strengths. He surrounded himself with people who had abilities he did not, e.g. the craftsmen, other artists and technocrats. Daring to follow his dream demonstrated self-confidence (self-awareness) and innovation (self-regulation), aspects of emotional intelligence (Goleman, 1998). His openness to new ideas, decentralization of power and his constant learning (shown by asking questions at board meetings and listening to the responses), demonstrated empathy.
Empathy is being aware of the feelings of others, their concerns and needs. It can be broken down into seeking understanding, development of others abilities, leveraging diversity to allow new ideas and opportunities to be heard, and being politically aware of a teams needs and power structure (Goleman, 1998). The CEOs social skill, another aspect of emotional intelligence, was demonstrated by cultivating relationships with investors, colleagues, and his employees. These aspects lead to trust which is the second most important characteristic of emotional intelligence (Cooper, 1997).
Trustworthiness is an important element in a leaders makeup as shown in the previously described study. Without trust, much time and effort is spent on non-productive activities because leaders feel compelled to draw up procedures in great detail, even for simple transactions (Copper, 1997). Innovation will stop when subordinates do not trust the leaders. Creativity will vanish if the sense of trust in an organization is lost and if people are preoccupied with protecting their backs. (Cooper, 1997). The second CEO probably lost the trust of his employees as a result of his lack of emotional intelligence.
Because the new CEO was not aware of how his actions and emotions were affecting others, he could be considered to be lacking in emotional intelligence (Ryback, 1998). Pitcher said that he blamed others for problems and did not look at the situational forces people were reacting to. In order for the technocratic leader to be able to see the situation realistically he must be aware of his own influence on the situation and the motives of others involved. According to Manfred F R Kets de Vries "to be able to decipher these deeper motives-to tease out the emotional, cognitive, and experiential components requires the capacity to "listen with the third ear an awareness about our own feelings, the knowledge and skill to handle those feelings, and an appreciation of emotions in other people (empathy)" (1999, p. 752). Mike Millers (1999) opinion is that many managers fail because they are too rigid and have poor relationships. As a consequence they are unable to adapt to changes in the business environment, organization, culture, work processes, and technology. Managers unable to receive or respond to feedback are unable to determine how they need to change their approach to leading others. This will alienate the people they work with by "being overly harsh in their criticisms, manipulative, insensitive, unethical, and untrustworthy. They cling to autocratic, outdated methods of direction and control. These managers demonstrate clearly that being technically talented is not enough to drive success" (Miller, 1999, p. 25).
It is apparent the second CEO was ignoring how his emotions influenced his actions in favor of an analytical or autocratic approach to management. Without emotional intelligence, the technocrat CEO was limited in his ability to influence people in a positive way, e.g. he did not help people to develop their potential. Being able to influence people is an important part of being an effective leader. It is easy to assign a project. It is another matter to persuade a colleague or superior to change his or her mind about a policy decision (Church, Waclawski, 1999). Clearly the major difference between the first and second CEOs was the level of emotional intelligence shown by each. While IQ serves as the entry-level requirement for executive positions, "emotional intelligence is the sine qua non of leadership" (Goleman, 1998, p. 94). An example of how emotional intelligence is used to express leadership is in the book "Seven Habits of Highly Effective People" by Stephen R. Covey (1989). xx
According to Covey the effect of developing the first three habits significantly increases self-confidence. You will come to know yourself in a deeper, more meaningful way. Understanding of ones nature, deepest set of values and unique contribution capacity becomes clearer. This is the foundation of emotional intelligence as defined by Daniel Goleman self-awareness. It is also the building of motivational ability. Covey continues, saying that as the first three habits continue to be developed, ones sense of identity, integrity, control and inner-directedness will increase. There will be an increase in caring about what others think of themselves and their relationship to you. This is the development of the self-regulation and empathy aspects of emotional intelligence. The next three habits describe the social skills of emotional intelligence. They help a person to heal and rebuild important relationships. Good relationships will improve, becoming more solid, more creative and more adventuresome. The seventh habit is developing ones self through the use of the first six habits. It is taking the time to reflect or further develop self-awareness.
Take into account the words used by Warren Bennis (1994) to describe a leader. He uses the words integrity, self-knowledge, enthusiasm, vision, purpose, pursue goals, and honesty. These are the same words used to describe various facets of emotional intelligence. Bennis in his book "On Becoming a Leader" (p. 44-45) has a list of interesting differences between a manager and a leader and they are given in the table below.
|Manager Vs. Leader
S. Hein - I would add that a manager let's others tell him what s "right". A leader decides for himself what is "right."
The difference between the manager and leader, as described by Bennis, is the same as described by Patricia Pitchers differences between the technocrat (manager) and the artist (leader). The description of the leader or artist uses characteristics of emotional intelligence.
A leader has to have emotional intelligence to align personal and subordinate goals to accomplish company goals. James A. Belasco and Ralph C Stayer (1993) suggest four responsibilities a leader must implement at all levels of an organization. First, transfer ownership for work to the people who do the work. Second, create the environment where the transfer of ownership can take place, where each person wants to be responsible for his or her own performance. This entails painting a clear picture of what the company believes great performance is, for the company and each person; focusing individuals on the few great performance factors; developing in each person the desire to be responsible for his or her performance; aligning organization systems and structures to send a clear message as to what is necessary for great performance; engaging each individuals heart, mind and hands in the business of the business; and energizing people around the business focus. Third, develop individual capability and competence. Fourth, create conditions in the organization that challenge every person to continually learn, including him or her self. These four principals align personal and company goals through emotional intelligence.
Belasco, J.A. Stayer, R.C (1993). Flight of the Buffalo. New York: Warner Books.
Bennis, W. (1994) On Becoming A Leader. New York: Addison Wesley.
Caudron, S. (1999). What Emotional Intelligence Is and Isn't. Workforce, 78, p 62.
Church, A.H., Waclawski, J (1999) Influence Behaviors and Managerial Effectiveness in Latereal Relations. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10 (1), Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Copper, R.K. (1997) Applying Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace. Training & Development, 51 (12), 31-38.
Covey, S.R. (1989) The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Simon & Schuster, New York: Fireside Book.
Goleman, D. (1995) Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
Goleman, D. (1998) Working with Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
Goleman, D, (1998) What Makes a Leader. Harvard Business Review. November-December, pp. 93-102.
Kets de Vries, M.F.R (1997) Creative Leadership: Jazzing Up Business. Chief Executive, 121 (March), 64-66.
Kets de Vries, M.F.R (1999) What's playing in the organizational theator? Collusive relationships in management. Human Releations, 52 (6), 745-773, ISSN 00187267.
Luthans, F. (1998) Organizational Behavior. Boston, MA. McGraw-Hill.
Miller, M (1999) Emotional Intelligence Helps Managers Succeed. Credit Union Magazine, 56 (7), 25-26.
Messmer, M. (1999) Building Leadership Skills. Strategic Finance; 81 (1), Montvale, p10-12.
Perrella, J.E (1999) The Importance of Working Together: Individuals add; team players multiply. Vital Speeches of the Day; New York, City News Publishing Company.
Pitcher, P. (1999) Artists,Craftsmen & Technocrats. Training & Development, July pp. 30-33.
Ryback, D (1998) Putting Emotional Intelligence to Work: Successful Leadership is More Than IQ. Boston: Butterwork-Heinemann.
Sosik, J. J., Megerian, L. E. (1999) Understanding Leader Emotional Intelligence and Performance. Group & Oraganization Management, 24 No.3, pp. 367-390.