Home Notes from a boom by psychologist
John Bradshaw
Poisonous
Pedagogy
The Swiss psychiatrist Alice Miller in her book, For Your
Own Good, groups these parenting rules under the title
"poisonous pedagogy." The subtitle of her book
is Hidden Cruelties in Child Rearing and the Roots of
Violence. She argues that the poisonous pedagogy is a
form of parenting that violates the rights of children.
Such violation is then reenacted when these children
become parents.
They exalt obedience as its highest value. Following
obedience are orderliness, cleanliness and the control of
emotions and desires. Children are considered
"good" when they think and behave the way they
are taught to think and behave. Children are virtuous
when they are meek, agreeable, considerate and unselfish.
The more a child is "seen and not heard" and
"speaks only when spoken to," the better that
child is. Miller summarizes the poisonous pedagogy as
follows:
1. Adults are the masters of
the dependent child.
2. Adults determine in a godlike fashion what is
right and wrong.
3. The child is held responsible for the anger of
adults.
4. Parents must always be shielded.
5. The child's life-affirming feelings pose a threat
to the autocratic parent.
6. The child's will must be "broken" as
soon as possible.
7. All this must happen at a very early age so the
child "won't notice" and will not be able
to expose the adults.
If followed, these family system
rules result in the absolute control of one group of
people (parents) over another group of people (children).
Yet in our present society, only in extreme cases of
physical or sexual abuse can anyone intervene on a
child's behalf.
Abandonment, with its severe emotional abuse, neglect and
enmeshment, is a form of violence. Abandonment, in the
sense I have defined it, has devastating effects on a
child's belief about himself. And yet, no agency or law
exists to monitor such abuse. In fact, many of our
religious institutions and schools offer authoritarian
support for these beliefs. Our legal system enforces
them.
Another aspect of poisonous pedagogy imparts to the child
from the beginning false information and beliefs that are
not only unproven, but in some cases, demonstrably false.
These are beliefs passed on from generation to
generation, the so-called "sins of the
fathers." Again, I refer to Alice Miller, who cites
examples of such beliefs:
1. A feeling of duty produces
love.
2. Hatred can be done away with by forbidding it
3. Parents deserve respect because they are parents.
(Note: Any 15-year-old can be a parent without any
training. We give telephone operators more training
than parents. We need telephone operators, but we
need good parents more.) [Emphasis mine.]
4. Children are undeserving of respect simply because
they are children.
5. Obedience makes a child strong.
6. A high degree of self-esteem is harmful.
7. A low-degree of self-esteem makes a person
altruistic.
8. Tenderness (doting) is harmful.
9. Responding to a child's needs is wrong.
10. Severity and coldness toward a child give him a
good preparation for life.
11. A pretense of gratitude is better than honest
ingratitude.
12. The way you behave is more important than the way
you really are.
13. Neither parents nor God would survive being
offended.
14. The body is something dirty and disgusting.
15. Strong feelings are harmful.
f 6. Parents are creatures free of drives and guilt.
17. Parents are always right.
Probably no modern parents embody
all of the above. In fact, some have accepted and imposed
the opposite extreme of these beliefs with results just
as abusive. But most of these beliefs are carried
unconsciously and are activated in times of stress and
crisis. The fact is, parents have little choice about
such beliefs until they have worked through and clarified
their relationships with their own parents. I referred to
this earlier as the problem of adult children. Let me
explain further.
Children's Belief Patterns
The great paradox in child-parent relationships is that
children's beliefs about their parents come from the
parents. Parents teach their children the meaning of the
world around them. For the first 10 years of life the
parents are the most important part of the child's world.
If a child is taught to honor his parents no matter how
they behave, why would a child argue with this?
The helpless human infant is the most dependent of all
living creatures. And for the first eight years of life,
according to the cognitive psychologist Jean Piaget,
children think nonlogically, egocentrically and
magically. You can better understand nonlogical thinking
by asking a four-year-old boy, who has a brother, if he
has a brother. He will probably answer "yes."
But if you then ask him if his brother has a brother, he
will usually either be confused or answer "no."
An example of egocentric thinking is to stand across from
a pre-five-year-old child who knows his right hand from
his left. Hold your hands out and across from him. Ask
him which is your right hand and your left hand. As his
right hand will be opposite your left hand, he will say
that your left hand is your right hand. His mind is
immature and has not yet attained the ability to
completely differentiate or separate himself from objects
around him. The child projects his own view of the world
on everything. His viewpoint is the only viewpoint.
Winnie-the-Pooh has exactly the same feelings the child
does. Little matter that Pooh is a toy bear. This
egocentricity contains a survival value- for the child as
it relates to self-preservation.
The magical part of the child's thinking deifies the
parents. They are gods, all-powerful, almighty and
all-protecting. No harm can come to the child as long as
he has parents. This magical idealization serves to
protect the child from the terrors of the night, which
are about abandonment and, to the child, death. The
protective deification of the parents, this magical
idealization, also creates a potential for a
shame-binding predicament for the child.
For example, if the parents are abusive and hurt the
child through physical, sexual, emotional or mental pain,
the child will assume the blame and make himself bad in
order to keep the all-powerful parental protection. For a
child at this stage, realizing the inadequacies of
parents would produce unbearable anxiety.
|
Contact
|