from "book_edited.txt" need Examples of Observing Behavior
The woman in this dialogue wanted to learn to hear the feelings and
needs behind certain of her husband’s statements. I suggested that
she guess at his feelings and needs and then check it out with him.

Husband’s statement: “What good does talking to you do? You never
listen.”

Woman: “Are you feeling unhappy with me?”

MBR: “When you say ‘with
me,’ you imply that his feelings are the result of what you did. I
would prefer for you to say, ‘Are you unhappy because you were
needing . . . ?’ and not ‘Are you unhappy with me?’ It would put your
attention on what’s going on within him and decrease the likelihood
of your taking the message personally.”

Woman: “But what would I say?
‘Are you unhappy because you . . . ?’ Because you what?”

MBR: “Get your clue from the content of your husband’s message, ‘What
good does talking to you do? You never listen.’ What is he needing that he’s not getting when he says that?”

Woman: (trying to empathize with the needs being expressed through
her husband’s message) “Are you feeling unhappy because you feel like
I don’t understand you?”


MBR: “Notice that you are focusing on what he’s thinking and not what
he’s needing. I think you’ll find people to be less threatening if
you hear what they’re needing rather than what they’re thinking about
you. Instead of hearing that he’s unhappy because he thinks you don’t
listen, focus on what he’s needing by saying, ‘Are you unhappy
because you are needing . . . ’”

Listen to what people are needing rather than what they are thinking
about us.

Woman: (trying again) “Are you feeling unhappy because you are
needing to be heard?”

MBR: “That’s what I had in mind. Does it make a difference for you to
hear him this way?”

Woman: “Definitely—a big difference. I see what’s going on for him
without hearing that I had done anything wrong.”

 
A second option is to fault the speaker. For example, in response to
“You’re the most self-centered person I’ve ever met,” we might
protest, “You have no right to say that! I am always considering your
needs. You’re the one who is really self-centered.” When we receive
messages this way, and blame the speaker, we are likely to feel
anger.
anger
Finally, a fourth option in receiving a negative message is to shine
the light of consciousness on the other person’s feelings and needs
as they are currently expressed. We might for example ask, “Are you
feeling hurt because you need more consideration for your
preferences?”
 
Example 1 A: “You disappointed me by
not coming over last evening.” B: “I was disappointed when you didn’t
come over, because I wanted to talk over some things that were
bothering me.” Speaker A attributes responsibility for the
disappointment solely to the action of the other person. In B, the
feeling of disappointment is traced to the speaker’s own desire that
was not being fulfilled.
still blaming, gt-ing

what can the other person say except sorry or something defensive

and what if the other person said they would come? aren't they in any way responsible?

Example 2

A: “Their cancelling the contract really irritated me!”

B: “When they cancelled the contract, I felt really irritated because I
was thinking to myself that it was an awfully irresponsible thing to
do.”

Speaker A attributes her irritation solely to the behavior of
the other party, whereas Speaker B accepts responsibility for her
feeling by acknowledging the thought behind it. She recognizes that
her blaming way of thinking has generated her irritation. In NVC,
however, we would urge this speaker to go a step further by
identifying what she is wanting: what need, desire, expectation,
hope, or value of hers has not been fulfilled? As we shall see, the
more we are able to connect our feelings to our own needs, the easier
it is for others to respond compassionately. To relate her feelings
to what she is wanting, Speaker B might have said: “When they
cancelled the contract, I felt really irritated because I was hoping
for an opportunity to re-hire the workers we had laid off last year.”

irritated?
I: Sounds like you’re feeling very desperate and you’re
wondering whether I or anybody else can really
understand what it’s like to be living under these
conditions. Am I hearing you right?
He: You want to understand? Tell me, do you have
children? Do they go to school? Do they have
playgrounds? My son is sick! He plays in open sewage!
His classroom has no books! Have you seen a school that
has no books?
I: I hear how painful it is for you to raise your children
here; you’d like me to know that what you want is
what all parents want for their children—a good
education, opportunity to play and grow in a healthy
environment . . .
He: That’s right, the basics! Human rights—isn’t that what
you Americans call it? Why don’t more of you come here
and see what kind of human rights you’re bringing here!
I: You’d like more Americans to be aware of the
enormity of the suffering here and to look more
deeply at the consequences of our political actions?

p 14 NVC L of Life

 
2. “ Mommy feels disappointed when you don’t finish your food, because I want you to grow up strong and healthy.”
 
“You people are acting like a bunch of Nazis.” A statement like that
is not likely to get the cooperation of a group of Israelis! Almost
immediately, an Israeli woman jumped up and countered, “Mukhtar, that
was a totally insensitive thing for you to say!” Here were people who
had come together to build trust and harmony, but after only one
interchange, matters were worse than before they began. This happens
often when people are used to analyzing and blaming one another
rather than clearly expressing what they need. In this case, the
woman could have responded to the Mukhtar in terms of her own needs
and requests by saying, for example, “I am needing more respect in
our dialogue. Instead of telling us how you think we are acting,
would you tell us what it is we are doing that you find disturbing?”
He doesn't suggest that she listen, try to understand the mukhtar
I want you to tell me what you heard me say. p